A long, long time ago, I started poking around the internet, looking for writing stuff: places that could help me improve as a writer, places that would give me information on where I could publisher--err, try to publish--the couple of short stories I had sweated out, and what to do about the ideas that were starting to develop in me, the things that seemed to want to become...novels. The long-dormant dream of being a writer had awakened, though I suppose it had never really gone away entirely.
Of course, the web is a big place and there's something for everyone here. No matter what your obsession, you can find it, and I found plenty of 'official' sites, like Absolute Write and NaNoWriMo and Writer's Digest, and I dove into those to help me learn. And I found the less 'official': the blogs. There are thousands of blogs out there, and of particular interest to me were the ones belonging to people who were like me: people who were writing with a dream in mind, the dream to become published authors. I followed some, and then decided to do my own blog, and some of us have been traveling on this rocky path together for more than three years already--it's hard to believe it's been that long. We've cheered for each other and commiserated with each other, we've come to know each other in that curious way that we know anyone on the web.
I am happy to say that three of my oldest friends from the blog world (well, let's change that, as they're not particularly old--three of the people I go back with the longest) have scored big time at the eFestival of Words Virtual Book Fair this weekend! Carrie Butler, Lisa Regan and Nancy Thompson each took home awards, and each of them were here almost from the beginning. Congratulations on your well-deserved success, ladies, and I wish you continued success!
Showing posts with label Lisa L. Regan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lisa L. Regan. Show all posts
Monday, August 25, 2014
Saturday, November 16, 2013
Tag, etc.
First, my apologies to all of you. I know you sat around all day waiting for my usual Friday post. Workplace productivity suffered, the market took a tumble, men and women beat their breasts and tore their hair....Or not. Anyway, because I never quite pre-write as much as I want, so that posting is a matter of a few minutes of edit and voila! I ended up running out of time yesterday morning, and I was out of the house from roughly 7:30 AM until around 11:15 last night. Here, instead, is the Saturday edition.
On a second note, I missed the initial announcement, and the day, but my condolences to fellow blogger Nick Wilford on the passing of his son, Andrew. I am very sorry for your loss, and though it's now a day late, better late than never:
Now, last week my pal Lisa Regan tagged me, and while I haven't played along in a while, I didn't have a whole lot else ready to go so I thought, "Yeah, I'll play along." Of course, it turned into a bigger production than I expected, part of why this is coming to you on Saturday instead of the usual Friday. The rules are simple: Answer four questions, tagfive three people, and Bob's your uncle.
So, here we go:
1. What are you working on?
Well, there are these four questions I have to ask, see, and...oh, right. I think just about anyone who's been reading this space for any length of time knows I'm elbows-deep in revisions for my novel, BARTON'S WOMEN (p. 213 out of 369 and shrinking--Bob would not approve). And now you're going to know why I didn't get this posted. Lisa put in a nice write up of her current project, so I kind of feel obligated, as well. Plus, you've been hearing bits and pieces about this thing for almost 2 (!) years now, and if I can't summarize it fairly quickly, I've got a problem. (Funny, I had a sheet full of potential log lines for this monstrosity, and I can't find it now. I've also got half-a-hundred query versions floating around out there. This isn't quite the latest query, but it's pieces of it.
Sunspots, Al-Qaeda, the government--Kevin Barton doesn't know why the power goes out in the little town of Harpursville, or why it also takes out phones, cars, practically everything. What he does know is he's got a family to feed, and their food and water won't last forever.
He's also got a problem in the form of Dina McCray, his daughter's best friend. Stranded at the Barton house, the sixteen-year-old helps with everything from hauling water to digging a garden. She's also another mouth to feed, and that puts her at odds with Kevin's wife, who counts every crumb and would love to get the girl out of the house. Then there's David Sobchuk, the man who keeps Harpursville from sliding into every-man-for-himself chaos. He makes Kevin an offer for Dina's 'services', but Kevin's not about to pimp her out for a few bundles of wood and some deer steaks.
As pressure mounts from inside and outside the Barton home, Kevin must find the power within himself to keep his family together and keep Dina safe. Their survival depends on it.
That's the first time I've ever gone quite so public with this. Gulp.
2. How does it differ from other works in its genre?
And here I play the special snowflake card. On the surface, BARTON'S WOMEN probably looks like Post-Apocalyptic or Dystopian fiction. I don't read either of those as a general rule; however, my impression of both those genres is that there's a lot of attention paid to the world. BW doesn't quite fit neatly into that mold. The emphasis here is on family and the dynamic among the characters. It's a little more literary in style, and I will likely pitch it as 'commercial'.
3. Why do you write?
Because it's fun. It's a kick. I write for the moments when I surprise myself, for the moments when I say, "Whoa, that's good." (yes, even I have those moments) I write because for the moment the light goes on, and I write for the feeling I get when I push back from the desk wrung out, exhausted, weary, but feeling great.
Man, am I selfish.
4. How does your writing process work?
Slowly, hah ha. There's an idea phase where something occurs to me. Something triggers a thought or a question--"what if?" or something like that. There's usually a stewing period (see this post), then something kicks the idea into the front room of my brain.
Once I start writing, it's Wingman, baby. No outlines, no snowflake sheets, no character interviews or charts, no beat sheets. BUT there is a lot of time spent in 'headspace', thinking about things, hearing dialogue, seeing action. When I sit down to write for the day I've spent a lot of time thinking things over, trying to make things fit, putting pieces together so they fit right.
And that is it. So, who do I tag? I tend to tag the same people over and over again. Let's see....
Stacy McKitrick
Wendy
Patrick Stahl
Please note, if this is an inconvenience or bother, or you don't participate in these sort of things, you are under no obligation to participate. Otherwise, consider yourself tagged! Enjoy the rest of your weekend.
On a second note, I missed the initial announcement, and the day, but my condolences to fellow blogger Nick Wilford on the passing of his son, Andrew. I am very sorry for your loss, and though it's now a day late, better late than never:
Now, last week my pal Lisa Regan tagged me, and while I haven't played along in a while, I didn't have a whole lot else ready to go so I thought, "Yeah, I'll play along." Of course, it turned into a bigger production than I expected, part of why this is coming to you on Saturday instead of the usual Friday. The rules are simple: Answer four questions, tag
![]() |
| God, no, not him! |
So, here we go:
1. What are you working on?
Well, there are these four questions I have to ask, see, and...oh, right. I think just about anyone who's been reading this space for any length of time knows I'm elbows-deep in revisions for my novel, BARTON'S WOMEN (p. 213 out of 369 and shrinking--Bob would not approve). And now you're going to know why I didn't get this posted. Lisa put in a nice write up of her current project, so I kind of feel obligated, as well. Plus, you've been hearing bits and pieces about this thing for almost 2 (!) years now, and if I can't summarize it fairly quickly, I've got a problem. (Funny, I had a sheet full of potential log lines for this monstrosity, and I can't find it now. I've also got half-a-hundred query versions floating around out there. This isn't quite the latest query, but it's pieces of it.
Sunspots, Al-Qaeda, the government--Kevin Barton doesn't know why the power goes out in the little town of Harpursville, or why it also takes out phones, cars, practically everything. What he does know is he's got a family to feed, and their food and water won't last forever.
He's also got a problem in the form of Dina McCray, his daughter's best friend. Stranded at the Barton house, the sixteen-year-old helps with everything from hauling water to digging a garden. She's also another mouth to feed, and that puts her at odds with Kevin's wife, who counts every crumb and would love to get the girl out of the house. Then there's David Sobchuk, the man who keeps Harpursville from sliding into every-man-for-himself chaos. He makes Kevin an offer for Dina's 'services', but Kevin's not about to pimp her out for a few bundles of wood and some deer steaks.
As pressure mounts from inside and outside the Barton home, Kevin must find the power within himself to keep his family together and keep Dina safe. Their survival depends on it.
That's the first time I've ever gone quite so public with this. Gulp.
2. How does it differ from other works in its genre?
And here I play the special snowflake card. On the surface, BARTON'S WOMEN probably looks like Post-Apocalyptic or Dystopian fiction. I don't read either of those as a general rule; however, my impression of both those genres is that there's a lot of attention paid to the world. BW doesn't quite fit neatly into that mold. The emphasis here is on family and the dynamic among the characters. It's a little more literary in style, and I will likely pitch it as 'commercial'.
3. Why do you write?
Because it's fun. It's a kick. I write for the moments when I surprise myself, for the moments when I say, "Whoa, that's good." (yes, even I have those moments) I write because for the moment the light goes on, and I write for the feeling I get when I push back from the desk wrung out, exhausted, weary, but feeling great.
Man, am I selfish.
4. How does your writing process work?
Slowly, hah ha. There's an idea phase where something occurs to me. Something triggers a thought or a question--"what if?" or something like that. There's usually a stewing period (see this post), then something kicks the idea into the front room of my brain.
Once I start writing, it's Wingman, baby. No outlines, no snowflake sheets, no character interviews or charts, no beat sheets. BUT there is a lot of time spent in 'headspace', thinking about things, hearing dialogue, seeing action. When I sit down to write for the day I've spent a lot of time thinking things over, trying to make things fit, putting pieces together so they fit right.
And that is it. So, who do I tag? I tend to tag the same people over and over again. Let's see....
Stacy McKitrick
Wendy
Patrick Stahl
Please note, if this is an inconvenience or bother, or you don't participate in these sort of things, you are under no obligation to participate. Otherwise, consider yourself tagged! Enjoy the rest of your weekend.
Friday, September 20, 2013
Bits and Pieces for a Friday
It's Friday morning, and I'm once more not ready with a well-organized, deeply thought out topic. I have ideas, mind you, but I don't have as much time during the week as I used to so it all kind of gets put off and we end up with this sort of loose collection of nonsense. Here goes.
-Well, it finally happened. The spammers, the bots, the spam-bots--they've gotten to be too much. This week alone, 8 Anonymous spam-bots tried to leave comments on the blog. They go in blogger's built-in spam filter, but they also come straight to my e-mail. I decided against 'no moderation' for a reason--I hate when I can't see the comments other people have made on a blog while I'm leaving my own--and I allowed anonymous posts for a reason, but no more. I suspect once the bots realize they can't leave their little self-promotions for virus inducing websites here, they'll go away, and the recent boom in visitation will come back down to normal levels. I hope the change doesn't cause any issues; if it does, leave a comment (hah hah!). Actually, if you want to leave a comment on this or other blog posts but can't, check my profile, my e-mail is there, and send me a nasty-gram that way.
-Interesting posts this week from Chuck Wendig and Stacy McKitrick on reviews this week. Now, if you've read this before from me, feel free to skip to the next block--maybe there's something new there. Everyone is free to make their own choice about whether to review or not, and how and what they review. It bothers me quite a bit, however, that people who do review feel like they can't always be honest in what they're saying. If you don't like a book, there should be no fear whatsoever that the author or their legion of fans is going to come after you, or launch a smear campaign against your own book when it comes out. As I said there, it's outrageous that people get outraged when their books (or their favorite books by their favorite authors) get less than four or five stars.
I find myself thinking of a routine I saw done years and years ago by comedian David Brenner. He was talking about mosquitoes, and how horrible it is to wake up in the middle of the night with that nasty little, whiny buzz in your ear, the sound that a mosquito is closing in for a bite. But, noted Brenner, it's the male mosquito that buzzes, to attract a mate. Male mosquitoes don't bite. "So," said Brenner, "if you wake up and you hear it--bzzzzzzzzz--just turn over, go back to sleep, it's nothing to worry about. But," he said, and paused. "If you hear nothing...."
I think you can figure out the implication of that.
-Jonathan Franzen made the news for a 5600-word rant against e-books, Apple, Amazon, and Jennifer Weiner in the Guardian this week. Ironic, considering his new book is available as an e-book from Amazon. See Porter Anderson for a great round-up on this.
-And for my own technology rant: yesterday I made a phone call for work, reached my target, introduced myself and why I was calling (the guy I reached is no stranger to my organization). He let me get through this spiel, then said, in a very impatient, snippy way, "I'll have to call you back. I'm in a meeting." This last was said in a way that made it sound like I had a lot of nerve, bothering him while he was in a meeting. I was properly apologetic and professional (I strive to be like Mr. Pink, if you know what I mean) and hung up without taking more of his time, but after I did, all I could was, "If you're in a meeting, why the f*** did you answer the phone?"
-I'm beta reading for a friend, and loving it. Not just the story, not just the fact that it's out of my genre (and, truth be told, I still struggle a bit to figure out what it is I'm writing), but the fact that I see things that will help me. Word choices, sentence and paragraph structure, pacing--once more I say, if you haven't beta read, you should. Help others while helping yourself.
-More on the writing front, I'm working on a short for the next anthology from Elephant's Bookshelf (and here's a great interview Matt Sinclair did with Richard Pieters, author of one of the stories in Summer's Double Edge), and, slowly but surely, I've been cracking into BARTON'S WOMEN.
That's it for me, how's it all going for you? Have a great weekend!
*Spam wall by Freezelight
-Well, it finally happened. The spammers, the bots, the spam-bots--they've gotten to be too much. This week alone, 8 Anonymous spam-bots tried to leave comments on the blog. They go in blogger's built-in spam filter, but they also come straight to my e-mail. I decided against 'no moderation' for a reason--I hate when I can't see the comments other people have made on a blog while I'm leaving my own--and I allowed anonymous posts for a reason, but no more. I suspect once the bots realize they can't leave their little self-promotions for virus inducing websites here, they'll go away, and the recent boom in visitation will come back down to normal levels. I hope the change doesn't cause any issues; if it does, leave a comment (hah hah!). Actually, if you want to leave a comment on this or other blog posts but can't, check my profile, my e-mail is there, and send me a nasty-gram that way.
![]() |
| Hoochie mama, that's a lot of spam! |
-Interesting posts this week from Chuck Wendig and Stacy McKitrick on reviews this week. Now, if you've read this before from me, feel free to skip to the next block--maybe there's something new there. Everyone is free to make their own choice about whether to review or not, and how and what they review. It bothers me quite a bit, however, that people who do review feel like they can't always be honest in what they're saying. If you don't like a book, there should be no fear whatsoever that the author or their legion of fans is going to come after you, or launch a smear campaign against your own book when it comes out. As I said there, it's outrageous that people get outraged when their books (or their favorite books by their favorite authors) get less than four or five stars.
I find myself thinking of a routine I saw done years and years ago by comedian David Brenner. He was talking about mosquitoes, and how horrible it is to wake up in the middle of the night with that nasty little, whiny buzz in your ear, the sound that a mosquito is closing in for a bite. But, noted Brenner, it's the male mosquito that buzzes, to attract a mate. Male mosquitoes don't bite. "So," said Brenner, "if you wake up and you hear it--bzzzzzzzzz--just turn over, go back to sleep, it's nothing to worry about. But," he said, and paused. "If you hear nothing...."
I think you can figure out the implication of that.
-Jonathan Franzen made the news for a 5600-word rant against e-books, Apple, Amazon, and Jennifer Weiner in the Guardian this week. Ironic, considering his new book is available as an e-book from Amazon. See Porter Anderson for a great round-up on this.
-And for my own technology rant: yesterday I made a phone call for work, reached my target, introduced myself and why I was calling (the guy I reached is no stranger to my organization). He let me get through this spiel, then said, in a very impatient, snippy way, "I'll have to call you back. I'm in a meeting." This last was said in a way that made it sound like I had a lot of nerve, bothering him while he was in a meeting. I was properly apologetic and professional (I strive to be like Mr. Pink, if you know what I mean) and hung up without taking more of his time, but after I did, all I could was, "If you're in a meeting, why the f*** did you answer the phone?"
-I'm beta reading for a friend, and loving it. Not just the story, not just the fact that it's out of my genre (and, truth be told, I still struggle a bit to figure out what it is I'm writing), but the fact that I see things that will help me. Word choices, sentence and paragraph structure, pacing--once more I say, if you haven't beta read, you should. Help others while helping yourself.
-More on the writing front, I'm working on a short for the next anthology from Elephant's Bookshelf (and here's a great interview Matt Sinclair did with Richard Pieters, author of one of the stories in Summer's Double Edge), and, slowly but surely, I've been cracking into BARTON'S WOMEN.
That's it for me, how's it all going for you? Have a great weekend!
*Spam wall by Freezelight
Monday, September 2, 2013
Child's Play
Yesterday morning a post turned up in my Facebook feed from my friend, Lisa Regan, and I consider myself lucky to have seen it, because it's Facebook, and things get shuffled, ordered and reordered, with no rhyme or reason, kind of like Amazon rankings. At any rate, this was close enough to the top of the feed Sunday morning that I saw it. Tomorrow, it may be lost seemingly forever, only to show up again next December, even if no one comments or likes it. Who can say?
Anyway, Lisa relayed how she sat in her car with her 5-year-old daughter, waiting for her husband to come out of the store. The daughter is playing with a My Little Pony figure and invites Lisa to play along.
"Sorry, hon, I don't have a pony."
"Do you have a pen?"
Lisa hands a pen to her daughter, who takes the pen, grabs Lisa's hand, and draws a smiley face on her fingertip.
"Now you've got one," she says. "Let's play."
That picture of Lisa's smiling fingertip and her story made my day. It's so typical of kids to think this way. They have not been trained by the world to look for the faults first; instead, they see possibility and potential, and they're typically not afraid to try out their solutions and have them fail. Kids are unabashed imaginators and problem solvers.
Lisa's story also triggered a thought process about what got me back into writing fiction. I had never really considered the possibility that my kids played any role in resurrecting my long-buried desire to write fiction, but maybe there's something there.
When the Magpie and the Catbird were little, my wife and I made sure we read to them every day. We read to them at bedtime, we read to them while we were feeding them, we read to them as we were putting them down for naps. We read board books and Boynton, Dr. Seuss and the Berenstain Bears. When they got older, it was Junie B. Jones and the Magic Treehouse, Harry Potter, Where The Red Fern Grows. When they were old enough to read on their own, they read to us. And in addition to reading, we played. And we played, and we played, and we played. We played board games and card games, and we built with legos and blocks, but probably the most popular game were variations on games with ponies. The girls had horses. Lots of horses. And we played with them all the time.
For an adult, kid play can sometimes be remarkably frustrating, especially when the kid dictates everything. "OK, he's going to do this…" says the kid, and you have to make him do THIS or it all falls apart. But it's also amazing and creative and limitless. I spent hours with the girls, bending to their will while trying to maintain some degree of autonomy, while horses flew and ran and escaped the clutches of the bad guys who were trying to kidnap them. As frustrating as it could be at time, I admit I had a lot of fun. It was the sort of play that I hadn't really experienced since before I was a teenager.
Eventually, of course, that sort of play tapered, then stopped. In all honesty, it was partly relief and partly sad. The girls both became more solitary (or, perhaps more accurately, their social activities were directed in different ways), more mature in their pursuits. It's a natural progression, one that I had gone through, and my parents too, and their parents, on and on for millennia. Some day, their children will do the same. It's the natural order of things.
But where does the writing come in? The desire to write really seemed to kick in again around the time the Catbird, being younger, moved out of that "let's play" phase of life. There were other factors involved, too, but Lisa's post made me rethink the connection between my kids and my writing. Playing with my kids as much as I did, I think, tapped some well of imagination that had been largely covered over. Once they stopped needing me for that kind of play, the connection, fortunately, remained open, but it needed an outlet. Perhaps if I had studied music more seriously as a kid, I'd be playing piano or guitar now, or maybe I'd be painting or joining the local theater company. But I've always gravitated toward the written word, so it's natural that the creativity would leak out and be satisfied in that direction. I'm glad it did because, as frustrating as writing can sometimes be, it's satisfying and fun. Thanks, kids!
Anyway, Lisa relayed how she sat in her car with her 5-year-old daughter, waiting for her husband to come out of the store. The daughter is playing with a My Little Pony figure and invites Lisa to play along.
"Sorry, hon, I don't have a pony."
"Do you have a pen?"
Lisa hands a pen to her daughter, who takes the pen, grabs Lisa's hand, and draws a smiley face on her fingertip.
"Now you've got one," she says. "Let's play."
That picture of Lisa's smiling fingertip and her story made my day. It's so typical of kids to think this way. They have not been trained by the world to look for the faults first; instead, they see possibility and potential, and they're typically not afraid to try out their solutions and have them fail. Kids are unabashed imaginators and problem solvers.
Lisa's story also triggered a thought process about what got me back into writing fiction. I had never really considered the possibility that my kids played any role in resurrecting my long-buried desire to write fiction, but maybe there's something there.
When the Magpie and the Catbird were little, my wife and I made sure we read to them every day. We read to them at bedtime, we read to them while we were feeding them, we read to them as we were putting them down for naps. We read board books and Boynton, Dr. Seuss and the Berenstain Bears. When they got older, it was Junie B. Jones and the Magic Treehouse, Harry Potter, Where The Red Fern Grows. When they were old enough to read on their own, they read to us. And in addition to reading, we played. And we played, and we played, and we played. We played board games and card games, and we built with legos and blocks, but probably the most popular game were variations on games with ponies. The girls had horses. Lots of horses. And we played with them all the time.
| I never got to be Wonder Pony. |
For an adult, kid play can sometimes be remarkably frustrating, especially when the kid dictates everything. "OK, he's going to do this…" says the kid, and you have to make him do THIS or it all falls apart. But it's also amazing and creative and limitless. I spent hours with the girls, bending to their will while trying to maintain some degree of autonomy, while horses flew and ran and escaped the clutches of the bad guys who were trying to kidnap them. As frustrating as it could be at time, I admit I had a lot of fun. It was the sort of play that I hadn't really experienced since before I was a teenager.
Eventually, of course, that sort of play tapered, then stopped. In all honesty, it was partly relief and partly sad. The girls both became more solitary (or, perhaps more accurately, their social activities were directed in different ways), more mature in their pursuits. It's a natural progression, one that I had gone through, and my parents too, and their parents, on and on for millennia. Some day, their children will do the same. It's the natural order of things.
But where does the writing come in? The desire to write really seemed to kick in again around the time the Catbird, being younger, moved out of that "let's play" phase of life. There were other factors involved, too, but Lisa's post made me rethink the connection between my kids and my writing. Playing with my kids as much as I did, I think, tapped some well of imagination that had been largely covered over. Once they stopped needing me for that kind of play, the connection, fortunately, remained open, but it needed an outlet. Perhaps if I had studied music more seriously as a kid, I'd be playing piano or guitar now, or maybe I'd be painting or joining the local theater company. But I've always gravitated toward the written word, so it's natural that the creativity would leak out and be satisfied in that direction. I'm glad it did because, as frustrating as writing can sometimes be, it's satisfying and fun. Thanks, kids!
Friday, June 7, 2013
Aberrant? Oh, You Betcha
Congratulations to Lisa L. Regan on the arrival of her second book, Aberration, born yesterday to already strong reviews! I'm looking forward to getting hold of this one, it promises to be an enjoyable read, in that strange way that suspense is enjoyable.Rather than do any sort of blog tour, Lisa decided to do something different: a blog hop. And so we have The Aberration Blog Hop: Finding The Most Aberrant Characters.
How does it work? Easy. Sign up (Hurry! Today is the last day!), list your top five choices for most aberrant character from literature, television, or movies, and Bob's your uncle. You can also add a blurb on a favorite aberrant character from your own work, if you're one of them writer types (and let's face it, if you're reading this, you probably are).
Finding the most aberrant character from books, TV and movies is no easy task; there are just so many of them. Those listed below have struck me as particularly aberrant for one reason or another, though I note that, as I've been reading other entries, I repeatedly find myself smacking my forehead, saying, "How could I have missed that one?" Like I said, there are a lot of them. And, by the way, it's funny how we focus so much on the negative side of 'Aberrant'. There's a shading of the word as defined that implies 'aberrant=bad', though you could make the argument that aberrant is just different, which is why Dana Mason had Forrest Gump on her list. That certainly made me think differently, though I was already committed. Who are they? Here we go (in no particular order):
Annie Wilkes, Misery, by Stephen King. The good news for
writer Paul Sheldon—he's dragged from his wrecked car by a registered nurse who
adores his books and is his "number one fan." The bad news? He's been
dragged from his wrecked car by a registered nurse who adores his books and is
his "number one fan." Annie Wilkes makes all those Goodreads/Amazon
review trolls look like Gandhi. Annie is horribly disappointed when she finds Paul kills off her favorite romance heroine in the final installment of his Misery Chastain adventures, and him
write a new one, just for her. Along the way, she gets him hooked on painkillers, makes him
drink rinsewater, and has lots of fun with sharp objects. What's most
frightening about this book is that, unlike King's tales of vampires and extraterrestrial spiders disguising themselves as killer clowns, there is nothing paranormal about it. Annie
Wilkes could—and probably does—exist.
By the way, if you're a writer you should read this book, even if you aren't a King fan. There are loads of interesting 'writer stuff' in here, specifically about playing fair
and not 'cheating the reader'. Writers writing about writers often feel self-indulgent. Not this one.
Hannibal Lecter,
Red Dragon, Silence of the Lambs, Hannibal, etc., by Thomas Harris.
The good doctor is turning up on a lot of these lists, and with good reason. When you
watch Anthony Hopkins' riveting take on Lecter in the film version of Silence of the Lambs, it's
hard to remember that Dr. Lecter was a bit player in terms of 'page time' in Red Dragon, Harris's first book to
feature the cannibalistic doctor. Lecter is a terrifying villain because of his intellect and mastery of psychology. He's also witty, tasteful, classy, and charming in his way, to the point where you can
almost forget he eats people. In Red Dragon, he goes out of his way to try
to kill Will Graham from behind bars, using the classified ads of a sleazy tabloid to communicate with the serial killer known as The Tooth Fairy.
Roger, Lord of the Flies, by William Golding. Roger is a cruel and
sadistic boy, whose impulses to tease, torture, and bully have been kept in check by society. On the island, free of the rules and policing adults, Roger gets his jollies by bullying the 'littluns', killing a pig with a very sharp stick, and, eventually, torturing other boys, like Samneric. One of the beautiful things about this book is how so much of the violence is implied. We know what he did to the pig, and where he put that stick. We're never sure what he does to the other boys, and that's brilliant storytelling. He is a frightening character, because he makes us wonder about ourselves in the same situation.
Jumping over to movies, we're going to go with Mr. Blonde, of
Quentin Tarantino's Reservoir Dogs. Michael Madsen's portrayal of Mr. Blonde,
aka Vic Vega, is one of the highlights of Tarantino's directorial debut. The
guy is so cool and collected as he antagonizes his fellow robbers, keeping a "We're just joking here" gleam in his eyes, yet you know he won't hesitate to do something awful. And that he does. I'm hearing Stuck in the Middle With You as I write this, and it's creeping me out. Time to move on.
The Joker, Batman. Sure, it's easy to point to Heath Ledger's performance
in The Dark Knight as the be-all and end-all performance take on this character, but look at this (listen, too) and tell me this isn't somehow worse:
Victor Frankenstein, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley. The guy builds people out of spare parts. 'nuff said.
(Dis)Honorable mentions: Tyler Durden, Fight Club, by Chuck Palahniuk, George Stark, The Dark Half by Stephen King. Figments of the imagination come to life, these two wreak havoc on their 'creators' in often brutal, ways.
Gaear Grimsrud, Fargo. The 'Big Fella' knows how to use a wood chipper.
About 80% of the adults in Oliver Twist, by Charles Dickens, but I'll single out Bill Sikes, the housebreaker. Fagin is nasty and
manipulative; Sikes is an out-and-out brute who beats women and children alike.
And one more: Walter White, Breaking Bad. We can sympathize with him early on, but the man shows no remorse, no regard, no thought to the lives he's likely ruining by making meth. And he's full of himself. Check out this brilliant clip:
As for my own work, sadly, I don't deal (so far) with characters like these, for the most part. However, there is a character, Roger Fields, in BARTON'S WOMEN. He's a bit player who doesn't figure prominently in the book, but every time I wrote a scene with him in it, I had the creeping feeling that there was something really sleazy about the guy, just waiting to be discovered. And yes, the name choice was deliberate (see entry #3).
Wow, that's about it for me. What about you? Who's on YOUR list? Thanks for stopping and reading, thanks to Lisa for coming up with this great idea. Have a great weekend, and congratulations to Lisa for book #2!
And one more: Walter White, Breaking Bad. We can sympathize with him early on, but the man shows no remorse, no regard, no thought to the lives he's likely ruining by making meth. And he's full of himself. Check out this brilliant clip:
As for my own work, sadly, I don't deal (so far) with characters like these, for the most part. However, there is a character, Roger Fields, in BARTON'S WOMEN. He's a bit player who doesn't figure prominently in the book, but every time I wrote a scene with him in it, I had the creeping feeling that there was something really sleazy about the guy, just waiting to be discovered. And yes, the name choice was deliberate (see entry #3).
Wow, that's about it for me. What about you? Who's on YOUR list? Thanks for stopping and reading, thanks to Lisa for coming up with this great idea. Have a great weekend, and congratulations to Lisa for book #2!
Monday, June 3, 2013
Sports Narratives
Hey, a guy could get used to this.
Sitting back, cool, salt-tinged breeze, cold drink at
hand—yeah, it would be easy to just send a postcard back that says, "You
know, I've decided to stay. So long, and thanks for all the fish."
Of course, that ignores the fact that, within about three
minutes of posting my, "I'm going to take a short break" message, I
had an idea for a post. And then another, and another. It would ignore the fact
that I came *this close* to posting on that first Monday of my little vacation,
and that I almost posted on Friday of last week, too. Then I decided to make
good on a promise made on this blog (for once), and stay out for the rest of
the weekend.
This week, Lisa Regan's second novel, Aberration, is being
released. To celebrate, Lisa is running The Aberration Blog Hop: Finding theMost Aberrant Characters on Thursday and Friday. Follow that link above to sign
up. It's quite a tall task, winnowing the list down, as there are so many
memorable, aberrant characters. I'm looking forward to it, and to reading
Aberration.
Now, on to the business at hand. This post almost got put up
on Friday, but like I said above, I decided to sacrifice timeliness for sanity.
It's still timely, I guess. I just have to make a few changes.
If you're ever feeling insecure about the future of fiction,
stop worrying. Worry about whether you can make a living as an author of
novels, sure. Worry over whether you should seek publication via traditional
means, or if you should join the growing ranks of self-publishers. Worry over
how much the next wave of technology is going to change how we present our
stories, if at all. Worry over whether or not your style is current enough, or
whether readers will like you, but don't worry about fiction. Styles and tastes
change, packaging and delivery change, but what doesn't change is our need for
stories. People need stories, and as long as that's the case, we need people to
write 'em.
For proof, look no further than the world of sports. Last
week, while the Boston Bruins and Pittsburgh Penguins were waiting for their semifinal
series to start, Puck Daddy, a Yahoo hockey blog, ran this story: Penguins Vs.Bruins: 10 must-watch storylines for the Eastern Conference Final.
It's a typical sort of story that comes out at this time of
year. As a Bruins fan who spends far too much time scanning online editions of Boston
newspapers, I see this sort of thing all the time. Between all the
sportswriters who have to fill column space and sell papers, bloggers trying to
generate click-throughs, and TV talking heads who have to fill
three-minute blocks between commercial breaks every night, there are stories about
everything. And while it's a bit different than pure fiction, it doesn't feel that far
off. Whether it's rehashing the details of how new-Bruin, Jaromir Jagr played on
the Boston-beating Penguins in 1991 and 92 (yeah, he's that old, and yeah, it shows on the ice), or wondering if the Bruins are
angry with Jarome Iginla for rejecting them at the trade deadline in favor of
the Penguins, or if they're going to 'go after' Matt Cooke for his dirty hit of
three years ago, or…or…or.
It's funny, isn't it? At this stage of the playoffs, we have
the four best teams (and hey, the four remaining teams are the last four Stanley Cup
winners—what a story!) playing great hockey. They're going
at each other at least four times, every other day. The action is intense, the
stakes are high. There may be more drama in the 'one-and-done' style of the NFL
or the NCAA tournament, but for a physical, high speed sport like hockey, the
series format ratchets everything up another notch. Hockey goes to eleven, to
borrow a phrase. The biggest story should be what happens on the ice each
night, not how player X was almost traded to team B. It should be enough. And
yet, here we are, manufacturing stories, magnifying the importance of this, that and the other thing. I think it says a lot about us, and
the future of writing. Writers will always be needed. Storytellers will always
be needed. Let the sociologists, anthropologists, and whateverotherologists who
study this sort of thing tell us why, because I sure don't know; I'm going to
settle down and watch a hell of a story unfold.
Friday, December 21, 2012
Author Interview: Lisa L. Regan
Well, I figure I woke up and found the world still here this morning, so it's going to be a good day. Christmas is nearly upon us (and from the looks of things, we may have snow on the ground for it for the first time in a couple of years), the Magpie is now home, and I'm pleased to be hosting my friend and newly-published author, Lisa L. Regan here today. Lisa's debut novel, Finding Claire Fletcher, was released to the world on December 6th, from Sapphire Star Publishing Company.
The idea for the premise was there for
years—at least a decade. In 2004, I was
trying to get back on the horse as they say and start a new novel. I had written an adult novel before that, but
it was terrible. So I was playing around
with different projects and premises at that time, trying to find something to
write. Then the first line of the book
popped into my head: “First time in a
bar?” It’s actually the first line of
chapter 2 now. I sat down in my writing
chair with a notebook and wrote the first 65 pages of the book in one
sitting. I knew there was a man and a
woman in a bar and that the woman had said that line. It just came out. Just like that. I didn’t even have character names. When I finished, I knew that this was the
story I need to write next.
I have none! I keep a
notebook in my purse and whenever I have time (waiting in line at the post
office or in a store, waiting at the doctor or dentist, waiting in the car
while my husband runs into a store) I will write. I try to always have whatever I’m working on
in the back of my mind so that when I do get ten minutes to pick up a pen, I
can get right into it. Then usually at
night when my daughter is asleep and my husband has fallen asleep watching TV,
I will pull out the old laptop and work on there. I just grab whatever free time I can get
wherever I have it and use that. Some of
my best work has been written in line at the post office.
What's next for Lisa L. Regan? Do you see yourself continuing in the same genre, or changing things up?
Wow, thanks so much for being here, and good luck with all of your projects. Merry Christmas, too!
Now, all, Lisa has a giveaway going on in celebration of Finding Claire Fletcher. Today is the last day to get in on it. You can win a $25 Amazon giftcard, a signed copy of Finding Claire Fletcher, or an e-book version of FCF. All you have to do is go here and leave a comment, but hurry! Signup ends today, drawing is on Christmas eve!
WHERE TO FIND IT
I'm not sure if I found Lisa's blog before she found mine,
but I remember liking her style right away. She was immediately relatable. After lots of commenting back and forth, Lisa very graciously offered to read the manuscript for
Parallel Lives. She's given me great advice on
PL and a few other things, and has been sympathetic and supportive when I get
grumbly or insecure. I confess I haven't read Finding Claire Fletcher in
its entirety yet. The Wife has it on her phone and she won't let me read it until she's done. She's enjoying it quite a bit so far, but life and Christmas and all that is slowing her down madly, and she won't let me have it until she's finished first. I'm going to have to start stealing it from her in the middle of the night. However, what I have read is compelling, and I've also had the pleasure of reading the first chapter or so of an upcoming Lisa Regan work. Good stuff, folks. Anyway, Lisa
graciously offered to answer a few questions for us, so here we go.
First, Lisa, you've been an officially published author now
for a couple of weeks. How does it feel?
It's weird, but in a really fabulous way. The first
few days are really crazy. There were so many messages via email and
social media--people sending congrats and kind words. It was
amazing. At one point, my phone actually just froze. It was really
incredible though. Then things settled down and now, in some
ways, it's like nothing has changed at all. I go to work, take care
of my family, the days are the same. But then I'll get a message from
someone via Facebook or email saying they just finished my book and it was
awesome. Then I'm like oh, right, my book is out there for anyone to
read, and I'm completely euphoric!
Okay, we've all seen the bio, now tell us something about
yourself we WON'T learn from reading your
'About Me' page.
One of my favorite things in the world is “tv show night”
with my husband. Depending on the time
of year, we’ll choose a TV show that we’re going to watch together and that day
of the week becomes a kind of at-home date night. We watched both seasons of Game of
Thrones. We just finished watching the
last season of Boardwalk Empire. It’s
just fun to cozy up with some snacks and be absorbed into a great story line
together. Then we talk about it, make
predictions, etc. If one of us can’t be
home the night a new episode is on, we tape it and save it until we can both
watch it together. No show-cheating
allowed!
That's a very nice way to spend some time together, and I
love that you make sure to talk about it, too. I love origins stories. Tell us
about the origins of Finding Claire Fletcher. How did it come about?
I’ve been obsessed with missing children ever since I was 11
and Jacob Wetterling went missing in Minnesota. [Jeffo's note: Wetterling went missing in 1989] That case really captured the attention of
the entire country. I never forgot
it. On the anniversaries of his
abduction, the media would put out age progression photos. I kept thinking, “I bet someone in this
country has run into him and didn’t even know it.” The idea of a random encounter with a missing
or abducted person was the premise for FCF. It just didn’t turn into a book until 2004
when I started writing FCF.
It's funny how an idea--a good idea--can float around in your head for so long before it's 'ready' to be written, and funny how the tiniest thing can trigger it. Has the
story changed from your initial vision?
In some ways, it hasn’t changed at all, and in others, it’s changed dramatically. The parts that are almost exactly the same as the day I hand wrote them in my many notebooks are the sections from Claire’s point of view. Very, very, very little changed in those sections—the ones told in her voice—from the first draft to finished product. This has always been her story, and my initial vision of it and the telling of it hasn’t changed at all from start to finish. What did change dramatically was the plot of the second half of the book. Originally the book went much farther into the future than it does now. Also my bad guy was far more maniacal in the second half of the book than he is now. Finally, the pacing is a lot different. I originally had Claire’s story framed by Connor’s search, and now I have the chapters staggered. I think it adds suspense.
Now, Plotter or Wingman?
In some ways, it hasn’t changed at all, and in others, it’s changed dramatically. The parts that are almost exactly the same as the day I hand wrote them in my many notebooks are the sections from Claire’s point of view. Very, very, very little changed in those sections—the ones told in her voice—from the first draft to finished product. This has always been her story, and my initial vision of it and the telling of it hasn’t changed at all from start to finish. What did change dramatically was the plot of the second half of the book. Originally the book went much farther into the future than it does now. Also my bad guy was far more maniacal in the second half of the book than he is now. Finally, the pacing is a lot different. I originally had Claire’s story framed by Connor’s search, and now I have the chapters staggered. I think it adds suspense.
Now, Plotter or Wingman?
These days I am much more of a plotter. Although I had the best time writing I’ve
ever had writing Finding Claire Fletcher, forging ahead with no plan at all
really crippled me in terms of seeking publication. It took a very long time to get the book to
where it is now. I think if I had
plotted more ahead of time, my journey would have been easier. So now I begin with a premise in mind,
character names, a loose idea of the plot and then I write a few thousand
words. Then I do a plot outline from
there and continue writing. I will
reference and change the plot outline as I move along, depending on what twists
the actual writing takes. But now I try
to start out by asking myself: “What am
I trying to accomplish in this book?”
We often hear about 'saggy middles' and writers who get
10, 20, 30,000 words into a book and then get lost and discouraged. Did you
ever hit a point during the writing of FCF
where you thought about throwing in the towel and giving up? What kept you
going?
Never in the actual writing of it. The book came out of me fast and
furious. I couldn’t get it out fast
enough. I was so sad when that first
draft was over. During the lengthy, prolonged,
painful revisions there were many times I wanted to throw in the towel. But Claire’s voice was too compelling to me.
She felt so real, and I was haunted by her voice, her story. I felt some weird sort of obligation to her
to see this thing through.
Describe your writing routine, if you have any. Are you a
morning writer, evening? Anytime?
What's next for Lisa L. Regan? Do you see yourself continuing in the same genre, or changing things up?
I will definitely continue in the crime
fiction/suspense/mystery/thriller genre.
This is what I love. My new
novel, Aberration will be out 6/6/13
from Sapphire Star Publishing. It’s got
an FBI agent. Then after that will be a Philadelphia
detective. Then I’d like to bring Connor
and Claire back as minor characters or intrepid crime solvers in a book with a
mystery at its heart.
Now, all, Lisa has a giveaway going on in celebration of Finding Claire Fletcher. Today is the last day to get in on it. You can win a $25 Amazon giftcard, a signed copy of Finding Claire Fletcher, or an e-book version of FCF. All you have to do is go here and leave a comment, but hurry! Signup ends today, drawing is on Christmas eve!
About Finding Claire Fletcher
Newly divorced and with his career in jeopardy, Detective
Connor Parks takes solace in the arms of a beautiful woman he meets at a bar.
The next morning, Claire Fletcher is gone, leaving nothing behind but an
address and a decade-old mystery. The address leads to the Fletcher family home
where Claire's siblings inform Connor that their fifteen-year-old sister was
abducted from a city street ten years ago and is presumed dead. During those
ten years, Claire endured the cruel torture and depravity of the man who
abducted her. Paralyzed by fear and too ashamed to return to her family, Claire
is resigned to her life as Lynn,
the identity her abductor forced upon her. Every time she attempts escape or
betrays him in the smallest way, someone dies. Even now, her clandestine run-in
with Connor Parks may have put his life at risk, as well as the lives of her
family. Connor is convinced that not only is Claire Fletcher alive, but that
she is also the woman he met at the bar. Driven to see her again, he begins his
own investigation, off the clock and without the police department's consent.
He is determined to find her and unravel the mystery of her abduction and odd
reemergence. But finding Claire Fletcher proves more dangerous than he
anticipates. In fact, it may be deadly.
WHERE TO FIND IT
If you haven't already done so, get it today, because the world is NOT ending today. Have a great weekend, everyone, and thanks for coming by!
Friday, December 7, 2012
Who Are We Trying to Reach?
On Wednesday, my friend Nancy Thompson made her monthly
Insecure Writers Support Group post. She's published now, but admitted to feeling a bit
of a letdown. Part of it, I'm sure, is the physical reaction to the go-go-go
that was her blog tour and the high of being able to go to Amazon and Barnes
& Noble and say, "Look, that's me!" At some point, you're just
going to run out of steam. But she was also noting how hard it is to connect
with readers. Nancy noted that,
while writing The Mistaken, she connected with writers, which is great, but she
goes on to say:
I didn’t take the proper time to make more connections, the kind I should’ve made in order to help sell my book. Writers make great friends and give wonderful support and advice, but, for the most part, they're not really buyers. Readers are buyers
We'll say it again, because it's important: Readers are buyers.
I'm a dedicated reader of a number of blogs, a regular
participant in the Absolute Write forums, and one thing that comes up all the
time is the notion of 'rules'. You know them well: Don't use adverbs. Don't use
passive voice. Show, don't tell. Write what you know. The rules have a place,
but they cause a lot of problems for new writers who see these rules broken all
the time by established authors. And the confusion is compounded when New
Writer posts a two sentence excerpt on a forum because they're confused about
grammar, and they get an answer that says something like, "Grammatically,
you're fine, but I'd be concerned because that sentence is all telling." They
then get lectured by four or five people for telling when they should be
showing. I hate those kinds of answers because they ignore context, and they
ignore the fact that sometimes, it's just plain best to tell.
Now there's a new rule, a rule that is heavily-pushed by
industry insiders: "you must have presence." 'Presence' in this case refers
at the very least to a website, though preference is given for interactive social
media. Like the 'Show, don't tell,' and 'Don't use passive voice' rules, a lot
of new writers are taking this to heart, and the result is a lot of blogs out
there like…well, like this one, and a lot of writers despairing over what it
means.
The problem is that new writers almost invariably blog about writing. There's nothing at
all wrong with this. It's a good way to help process and channel the sometimes
maddening things we go through, and it's a great way to meet people and to
learn and be inspired. I've gained so much from reading your blogs and
interacting with you, and from forcing myself to write something
meaningful twice a week. Best of all, I can say there are some real friendships
that have formed through this effort, and I don't make friends easily.
But Nancy is
right. Blogs like hers and mine attract like-minded people, and those
like-minded people are mostly fellow aspiring writers. And as Nancy
says, writers are not buyers. Yes, when I am published, some of you will buy my
books (now we're getting ambitious: it's not enough that I'm saying 'when', I'm
assuming multiple books – dream big, or go home!). Many of you will promote it
on your blogs and participate in blog tours and interviews and, like ripples on
a pond, word will spread of my fantastic contributions to literature – to other
writers. Getting the word out to the general reading public is another story.
So, how do we do that? Lisa Regan made a great point in the
comments section of Nancy's post:
"it's hard to connect with readers when you have nothing out for them to
read." What reader (meaning the generic reader, as opposed to the aspiring
writer reader) is going to visit this blog? There's no reason for them to come
here because I have nothing published, they don't know me from Adam. And if I
did somehow find a way to attract them here, well what's there for them to see?
A wanna-be writer whining about how he's stuck in the middle of his manuscript,
or recounting a crazy dream that relates to how anxious he is about sharing his
work. Who really wants to read that? Other writers who are in the same or
similar boat, that's who. When I'm published, I would need a different sort of
presence, I think, for the benefit of reader readers who are interested in me.
There's a lot of energy being expended on the internet by
writers trying to establish presence. My feeling, the longer I'm involved in
this, is relax. Blog if you want. Tweet, Facebook, whatever. But don't break
your back on any of them on the assumption that it's going to help get you an
agent or a publication deal, or that it's going to sell you a lot of books when
you do get your deal. Because chances are, you'll be trying to sell yourself to
yourself.
What do you all think? Am I nuts for saying this? Or is
there some other way to really connect with and build a readership before
you've been published? I really want to know.
Have a great weekend!
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Finding Claire Fletcher Launches!
Since starting this blog nearly two years ago, I have met many wonderful people. It's strange to think of people you've never seen face-to-face, or never even spoken to in a normal conversation, as friends, but there are a number of you I feel that way about. It brings me great pleasure to announce that my friend, Lisa L. Regan is releasing her first novel, Finding Claire Fletcher, today!
Lisa's going to be busy this month. She'll be here for an interview on December 21. For a full schedule, and to earn a chance to win valuable prizes, stop by here!
Here's the short story on the book:
Lisa's going to be busy this month. She'll be here for an interview on December 21. For a full schedule, and to earn a chance to win valuable prizes, stop by here!
Here's the short story on the book:
Down on his luck, Detective Connor
Parks takes solace in the arms of a woman he meets at a local bar, but in the
morning, Claire Fletcher is gone, leaving behind clues to a decade-old mystery.
Abducted at age fifteen, no one has heard from Claire Fletcher in ten
years. Until now. Driven
by an unsettling need to see Claire again, Connor sets out to solve the mystery of her disappearance once and for
all.
I am really looking forward to reading this, and I'm very excited for Lisa. It has been a long time in coming!
Where can you buy Finding Claire Fletcher, you ask?
Be sure to stop by Lisa's blog to find out where she is and wish her well! I'll be back tomorrow (I think).
Where can you buy Finding Claire Fletcher, you ask?
Friday, November 30, 2012
Looky, Looky
Well, I've learned a valuable lesson from Monday's post: NO MORE SPIDERS! I can talk about them (I think), but pictures are right out. It's funny how certain animals affect us. Birds? Mostly people are okay with them. Dogs? Cats? Obvious family pets. Turtles? I don't think I've met anyone yet who hates turtles. Frogs, now we're getting into squeamish territory. Snakes and spiders? Now we're into run-from-the-room territory. Lesson learned, no more spiders.
Anyway, my friend and Finding Claire Fletcher author Lisa L. Regan tagged me in this LOOK Meme that's been going around, thus saving me from having to write something else today. The idea is to find the first use of the word 'look' in your WiP and share it, along with a bit of the surrounding paragraphs. So, I've delved into Barton's Women and found the first use of it on page 3, word number 760, according to Word's handy-dandy counting device. The brief scene setting: Kevin Barton interrupts his 16-year old daughter, Kelly, and her friend, Dina, while they're watching The Little Mermaid, to say goodnight. I'll caveat this: I haven't actually read any of this since mid-October, and I'm already finding things I'd like to change. I suppose it could be #1 on every bestseller list and I'll still be saying that. Oh, well.
Well, there you have it. Definitely feels rougher than I thought when I sent it out on a test drive. And somehow not surprising that I use the word twice in a short span.
Now it's tag time. I'm pretty sure those I'm hitting up have not already done this; if I'm wrong, forgive me. And, of course, if you choose not to participate, that's fine, too. I can be kind of funny about sharing things when they don't feel 'ready'. Who's it going to be? Let's try....
Speaking of NaNo, where did November go? I think this may have been the fastest-moving month of the year so far. I could stand to have things slow down a little bit. I hope you've all had a good month, whether you NaNo'd or not. Thanks, as always, for stopping by and have a great weekend.
Anyway, my friend and Finding Claire Fletcher author Lisa L. Regan tagged me in this LOOK Meme that's been going around, thus saving me from having to write something else today. The idea is to find the first use of the word 'look' in your WiP and share it, along with a bit of the surrounding paragraphs. So, I've delved into Barton's Women and found the first use of it on page 3, word number 760, according to Word's handy-dandy counting device. The brief scene setting: Kevin Barton interrupts his 16-year old daughter, Kelly, and her friend, Dina, while they're watching The Little Mermaid, to say goodnight. I'll caveat this: I haven't actually read any of this since mid-October, and I'm already finding things I'd like to change. I suppose it could be #1 on every bestseller list and I'll still be saying that. Oh, well.
"No, no, no," he said. "I'm just joking."
"I know," she said. "But I do feel bad. Anyway, I have a
track meet tomorrow. Mom is going to pick me up around ten-fifteen."
"Oh, that’s right, I forgot. If you see my brain running around
here, throw a box over it and catch it for me, okay?"
Dina laughed. Kelly rolled her eyes again, but smiled. "Sure thing,
Mr. Barton."
"Can you get yourselves up, or do you need a wake-up call?"
The girls exchanged a glance. Kelly said, "9:45?" Dina nodded. They looked up at Kevin and
said, in unison, "9:45" and
Dina added ‘please.’
Kevin snapped off a salute. "Yes, ma’ams. Good night, ladies, don’t
stay up too late. You're both looking a little peaky."
He turned to leave, but Kelly said, "Wait, wait, wait." She
held her arms up in a gesture that made him think of her as a toddler,
demanding to be picked up.
He walked in, feeling a little embarrassed, and hugged her.
"Love you, Daddy," she said.
"Goodnight, sweetie." He straightened and gave a wave to Dina.
"Goodnight, Dina."
"Goodnight, Mr. Barton."
As he closed the door behind him, he heard Dina say, "You guys are
so cute."
Whatever Kelly said was lost under the sea.
Whatever Kelly said was lost under the sea.
Well, there you have it. Definitely feels rougher than I thought when I sent it out on a test drive. And somehow not surprising that I use the word twice in a short span.
Now it's tag time. I'm pretty sure those I'm hitting up have not already done this; if I'm wrong, forgive me. And, of course, if you choose not to participate, that's fine, too. I can be kind of funny about sharing things when they don't feel 'ready'. Who's it going to be? Let's try....
Bonnee, at The Blogging of an Aspiring Writer
One of my newest followers, Richard P. Hughes, at Writing and Living
And the Golden Eagle, from The Eagle's Aerial Perspective, who kicked NaNoWriMo's butt like nobody's business.
Speaking of NaNo, where did November go? I think this may have been the fastest-moving month of the year so far. I could stand to have things slow down a little bit. I hope you've all had a good month, whether you NaNo'd or not. Thanks, as always, for stopping by and have a great weekend.
Friday, November 9, 2012
Carts and Horses
What are people thinking lately?
If you're not familiar with Query Letter Hell, it's a
section of the Absolute Write forum where you can post your query or synopsis
and get it shredded, along with your ego, by anyone with an Absolute Write
account. It's like Matt's QQQE, though folks at QLH are less likely to soften
the blows (the people at both places are motivated by the same thing: the
desire to help writers turn out winning queries). At any rate, last month two
different writers posted query letters in the span of a week that had one
amazing similarity: they were both for books that had already been published.
The letters went up, and no one noticed the sig lines with pictures of the
book, or the link to Amazon.
The first letter received a good amount of critique. If
you've ever spent any time critiquing another writer's work, you know it's a
time-consuming process; this querier received a great deal of thoughtful,
constructive criticism, criticism that took time and effort from each of the
posters (and was met with flippant-bordering-on-rude replies from the querier).
Someone finally noticed, and said, "Hey, this book has already been
published!" and the thread got locked. The second one arrived a day or two
before the first one got shut down. This one was noticed much quicker, did not
get as much feedback, and died on the vine.
My question: What gives, people?
The time to query is before you publish the book. Say it
again: the time to query is before you publish your book. Publishers generally don't want books that have already been printed. Not unless you're selling books
at at the rate of Amanda Hocking or E.L. James, in which case, congratulations, they'll probably
be coming to you with a query of their own.
![]() |
| Freefoto.com - Ian Britton |
+++++++
HUGE congratulations to my friend Lisa L. Regan, who has
revealed the cover for Aberration, her second book, which will be released in
June. Head on over to her blog to take a peek. She also received printed copies
of Finding Claire Fletcher, which will be released in less than a month. I will
have an interview here with Lisa next month, watch for it.
Finally, I must be on to something, posting about potty
scenes. I eyeballed my stats for the week and was shocked, shocked I tell you,
about the number of page views The Potty Post has gotten. Now I just need to
figure out why….
Anyway, have a great weekend, all. See you Monday.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)





